53 CURED Cases The First Year

Cure, not treatment, is the subject of this book. In 1991 Dr. Clark discovered the source of HIV. Once the source became clear the cure became obvious. but would it work? After curing 53 cases in a row, all who used this method, Dr. Clark could wait no longer to present these findings. Since that time many more have been cured, too many to be added to this book. Most important is adding yourself to that list!

Electricity can now be used to kill bacteria, viruses and parasites in minutes, not days or weeks as antibiotics require.

If you have been suffering from HIV infection or AIDS related illness, learn to build the electronic device that will stop it immediately. It is safe and without side effects ad does not interfere with any treatment you are now on.

The negative reviews of this book all seem to promote antiretroviral drugs. These are by no means a magic bullet. They have many documented side effects and drug interactions,they are very expensive,and due to mutations are far from 100% effective. Alternative causes,treatments,and co-factors need to be investigated. The scientific evidence suggests that parasites play a major part in the development of AIDS. The steps that Dr. Clark suggests have been shown effective in eliminating parasites. Anyone who is HIV+ should try the steps outlined in this book. It is inexpensive,safe,and may very well be effective. Dr. Clark even encloses case studies of people who improved dramatically on this program. A negative review stated that since no mainstream publications,conferences,or papers supported this work it is quackery. The mainstream often censors information which is contrary to their view. This is why alternative causes,co-factors,and promising treatments for AIDS are not being investigated. I regard it as dangerous to hide from HIV/AIDS patients alternative information about the cause and treatment of AIDS.

Could have better explanations. It is a bit hard to understand.

and a sickening parasite 'The cure for a conscience' is what her next book should be titled. This a disgusting way to mislead, take advantage of and make money off those in dire need dealing with this deadly illness. I hold New Century Press and Amazon.com responsible for promoting this trash.

It seems critics usually attack because this is "outside" the accepted medical model. Have any of the critics ever read Dr. Stargell's report in the July 1998 AMA, where it is presented that the accepted medical model kills nearly as many people each year as heart disease? a report by a doctor based on research by doctors. So pehaps there is much offered outside the accepted medical model.

To me, the real question is: "Does it work?" If so, what is the cost, what are the side effects and where do I begin. Since there are no answers in the medical community, and the medical community seems to offer little hope, perhaps it is time to seek elsewhere. If it works, who cares what the doctor thinks? Not I. In fact, my experience is that going to the doctor for most ailments we face may well be the last thing I want to do. Mecicine and health are diverging lines. Medicine is not about health, it is about shifting symptoms with synthetic substances that have side effects. I choose health. If Hulda Clark and others like her with courage provide information that assists in building health, then I for one do not care one iota if she has the blessing of the medical community. It is time they began to change.

I truly admire Hulda Clark for her great contribution to the human race, with her such books which I've read and applied some of her ideas. It may seem radical yet what's the defintion of "normal" anyway? While some things may not work for an individual, it may work for others. As our bodies as well as our belief systems (which seems to be more important thing than anything) respond to different things, at different stages of Life. There's no ONE way for everyone. It may take some experiment and time to get the kind of results some may seek for, in however way we may find out there, either modern or traditional or such. What Hulda has done is that she offers an alternative way, to give some folks, desperate or not, chance to give it a try after their certain treatments fail or some treatment causing severe side effects turning their lives as unbearable to live. Some may disagree with the books yet there are couple of pratical logical things to do, to safeguard their health, like taking well known toxic stuff out of kitchen or better the entire house, what not to consume or inhale to avoid self-poisoning, healthier products to use for babies, so forth. Rather than condemning the whole book. To those who seem wanting to burn this book of Hulda's... I'm quite glad that we're in democratic society, with such kind of freedom we enjoy i.e. freedom of press. We do have rights to make intimate personal choices for ourselves and our health needs... WITHOUT much interference from those who disagree. Think and feel for yourself, without fear. They do have right to those opinions, that is, without taking or harming this such freedom we have. "Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it" - Chinese proverb (US and China, different political systems....hmmm) Read on and see what may help!